Skip to main content

Posts

Clean Max Enviro Energy Solutions Ltd IPO Not Got SEBI NOC - RTI

Recent posts

उमरिया जज की पुलिस मे शिकायत, Police Complaint Against Umaria Judge Ahamed Raza To Register FIR

  उमरिया (MP)जज अहमद रज़ा वर्चुअल हियरिंग नहीं करने देते न email का जवाब देते । सुप्रीम कोर्ट और high court के आदेश नहीं मानते। यह सब कार्य उनकी ड्यूटी का भाग नहीं है और जज protection act में कोई छूट नहीं देता।  Mumbai: Police complaint against MP state district Umaria Session Judge Ahamed Raza for not replying VC request for criminal revision. Conducting hearing without revisionist and not updating daily report on ecourt website. The revisionist continuously sending email for VC on many dates but judge never responded. Inspite of VC request he passed the final order and rejected FIR request . The judge is also not following MP High court VC rules which allow hearing from hybrid location. Complaint has been done to Mumbai police to register zero FIR against judgement cum public servant for not discharging duty as per direction of law ie Section 199 BNS AND others.  Supreme Court, Sarvesh Mathur Vs. The Registrar General, High Court of Punjab and Haryana [Writ Petition (Cr...

Motilal Oswal IPO Not Approved From SEBI-RTI ..... Rs 260 Cr SCAM FRAUD BY MOTILAL OSWAL GROUP IN 2007..SEBI IS SILENT ON THIS SCAM

MOFS RAAMDEO AGRAWAL SCAM EXPOSED!  Mumbai : Motilal Oswal Financial service Limited Launched IPO on 11 Sept  2007 and listed at NSE and BSE exchanges. The NSE and BSE listed MOFS Limited IPO without SEBI approval . SEBI said that copy NOC is not information as per SEBI law as per section 2f of RTI act. As per company act and SEBI law  SEBI permission is mandatory for IPO.  Complainant filed the complaint before the SEBI scores website . The MOFS replied that they filed Draft with SEBI and SEBI given observation letters with objections to comply. The MOFS limited has submitted the reply to SEBI but SEBI officer has not given any written certificate that all the objections has been removed by MOFS . So in writing SEBI has not given any NOC for IPO. So without SEBI compliance certificate NSE and BSE listed Rs 246 cr IPO . MOFS received this interest free money from investors without SEBI Permission which is corruption. SEBI officers put objections on Sahara IPO because...

Sikar HPCL Petrol Pump Operating Without Fire NOC

  Sikar: The Fire officer of Municipal council parishad of Sikar Rajasthan issued fire NOC to HPCL petrol pump operating since last 20 years without fire NOC . Phagalwa petrol pump, near IDBI bank , station road ,Sikar received municipal notice to do compliance of NBC fire code. HPCL claim that all its petrol pumps has full compliance but it is false and frivolous claim. HPCL playing with life of consumers by doing corruption.

IPO FRAUD : Clean Max Enviro Energy Solutions limited Launched IPO without SEBI NOC

  Mumbai:  Clean Max Enviro Energy Solutions limited Mumbai based company launching its IPO at BSE and NSE without SEBI Permission. SEBI has issued observation letter to clear objections in DRHP but company has not received and NOC . BSE and NSE are listing IPO without full SEBI compliance .Company will get Rs 3010 Cr from this IPO. Why NSE and BSE launching IPO after 2 days without SEBI NOC? Company failed to provide copy of SEBI NOC inspite of Email. Complaint has been filed before SEBI chairman to take strict action under section 15 HA of SEBI act 1992. It is the duty of SEBI to protect the interest of investors as per section 11 of SEBI act 1992. Why BSE and NSE interested in non genuine trading which is banned as per Supreme court order in SEBI VS Rakhi trading 2018 case .

Contempt Case Against Mumbai Session Court Staff For Obstruction Of Justice

  सेशन कोर्ट कर्मचारियों की गुंडागर्दी , E  FILING केस का Printout मांगते है , कोई नियम नहीं मानते।  Mumbai : Brijesh Sharma of Mira Road  filed contempt petition under section 15 of contempt of court act  against Mumbai session court Registrar and Criminal section sub-registrar for not assigning matter to court by e filing. Mr Brijesh Sharma filed 3 cases before ACB court Mumbai for registration of FIR under PC act 1988 by e filing. As routine manner the staff insist for physical copy of matter. Mr brijesh replied that as per Bombay high court e filing rules no physical copy is required to be submitted . The Principal session and District judge Mr Subramanium also not addressed the complaint . The registry denied to obey bombay High Court e filing rules and not listed the complaint before ACB court . Then he filed contempt petition by e filing . After seeing contempt case the registry allocated the matter to court without printout . As they holded the matter fo...