सीजेएम द्वारा सुप्रीम कोर्ट के आदेश की अवहेलना और राज्य को करोड़ों का नुकसान पहुंचा
Rajnandgon (CG) : Corruption complaint against Ex Rajnandgaon CGM is filed at ACB Raipur to register FIR against Judge Under section 7 and 13 of Prevention of corruption act 1988. In a CRPC 156 case she rejected to direct police to register FIR against the colonizer developer who used thefted minor minerals in building construction. As per SC order in illegal mining and transportation case (Delhi NCT Vs Sanjay Kumar 2014) illegal mining is offence under IPC 379,411. She suppress this ground in order to give advantage to accused . She only referred mining act and said that mining officer will look into this matter. In recall also she denied to include SC judgement in the order. As per complainant she taken advantage from mining mafia and passed order against supreme court settled law. She passed all the orders in filing number so that name of accused will not be available in court record . After scrutiny she must give UNCR registered number but she passed order in filing number. It give them exemption not to upload final orders in E court software.
Supreme Court of India
Salem Advocate Bar ... vs Union Of India on 2 August, 2005
Author: Y Sabharwal
Bench: Y.K.Sabharwal, D.M.Dharmadikhari, Tarun Chatterjee
1. Where computerization is available, data will be fed into the computer in such a manner that the court or judge or judges, referred to in Clause (2) above will be able to ascertain the position and stage of every case in every track from the computer screen.
All is done to give advantage to accused . The disproportionate asset allegation is also in complaint . As per SC order in charan singh ACB must conduct preliminary enquiry in disproportionate asset allegation. In a similar case ACB Session court Durg ordered SHO and SP preliminary enquiry in CRPC 156 PC act matter of same complainant. Matter is pending before ACB raipur for action for more than 6 months.
Comments
Post a Comment