India RTI News

  5 साल पहले यानी वर्ष 2017 में अमेरिका की हार्वर्ड यूनिवर्सिटी ने एक अध्ययन में पाया कि भारत में हर साल करीब 50 लाख मौतें मेडिकल नेग्लिजेंस की वजह से होती हैं। देश के हेल्थ सिस्टम पर इस स्टडी ने बहुत बड़े सवाल खड़े किए। लेकिन आज भी स्थिति में कोई बड़ा सुधार हुआ हो ऐसा नहीं लगता। इलाज में लापरवाही करने वालों पर अगर आरोप साबित हो भी जाएं तो महज छह महीने की जेल या फिर 500 रुपए जुर्माना देने भर से ही आरोपी राहत पा लेते हैं। सवाल है कि मेडिकल नेग्लिजेंस करने वालों पर लगाम कैसे लगेगी। COMPENSATION IN MEDICAL NEGLEGENCE  Dr. Balram Prasad v. Dr. Kunal Saha and Ors. (2014) 1 SCC 384 JUDGES: V. Gopala Gowda and C.K.Prasad Date of Decision: 24-10-2013 FACTS:- The claimant Kunal Saha, a US-based Indian- origin doctor filed a case of medical negligence which led to the death of his wife in 1998, against the negligent doctor and hospital before The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC). Kunal Saha contacted a  qualified wrongful death lawyer  to help him with his case. But, the NCDRC

         SCRB POLICE CIRCULAR VIOLATES MANY SUPREME COURT ORDER HAVE NO LEGAL VALUE. POLICE MANDATORY TO DO INVESTIGATION IN E FIR FOR ALL COGNIZABLE OFFENCE. Bhopal : The  State Crime Record Bureau  (SCRB) has framed E FIR Circular dated 13 Aug 2021 has many loop holes 1. Backed dated signed on 12/8/21 2. Directed Police to manual FIR after E FIR which is not allowed. In Other state no second manual FIR is done after E FIR . E FIR is allowed as per IT act 2000 . It is same as buying E Ticket from Indian railway and then again manual ticket is issued . Sameness principle The concept of sameness is to be construed in a restricted manner. As per  Surender Kaushik  and Others v State of Uttar Pradesh and others,  it does not allow registration of complaint that would amount to improvement of facts in the FIR that is filed at the first instance. It further prohibits complaint against the same accused. The subject matter of complaints is tested through  de facto  assessment of ‘test of sam

WHY WOMEN COMMITTEE DID NOT LISTENED THE GRIEVANCE OF LADY STAFF. JUDICIAL OFFICER REMOVED HER FROM SERVICE FOR COUNTERCHARGE  WHAT IS THE STATUS OF WOMEN SEXUAL HARASSMENT COMPLAINT AGAINST JUDICIAL OFFICER? DERELICTION OF DUTY IS TOOL USED AGAINST COURT STAFF   Madras High Court R.Umamaheswari vs The Registrar General IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : 18.09.2017 DELIVERED ON : 02.11.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.No.13504 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 R.Umamaheswari .. Petitioner Vs 1.The Registrar General, High Court of Madras, Chennai 104. 2.The Principal District Judge, Thanjavur. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the order of the first respondent made in o