CISCE ICSE ISC Board Is Unrecognized Board By Maharashtra , Delhi , HRD , MP Etc.No Approval From Any State....
CISCE IS OPERATING FAKE BOARD WITHOUT ACT OF PARLIAMENT OR STATE OR BY ANY EXECUTIVE ORDER.
NOT APPROVED BY ANY STATE OR CENTRAL
CHEATING PUBLIC SINCE LAST 60 YEARS!
In India Council for the Indian School
Certificate Examinations (CISCE)is operating ICSE/ISC public examination
without valid Approval/recognition . The ICSE and ISC is unrecognized Education
board which is not established by any act or executive order. All the state
boards and Central boards are established by act of state or executive orders .
The certificate of ICSE and ISC have no legal value in absence of law. Since
1959 the CISCE is running education board without any legal backing. CISCE is
one of the society registered at Delhi and have power to open school , library,
etc but not education board.
CISCE
has given declaration/ affidavits at various high courts that it is merely a
society and no act or executive order is passed in favour of CISCE till date.
Allahabad High Court
Pavitra vs Union Of
India And 2 Ors. on 15 December, 2014
Bench: Ashwani Kumar
Mishra
4.
Learned counsel for the Board, at the very outset, raised an objection that the
Board is not a 'public authority', in view of Section 2(h) of the Act, and consequently, it is not required
to provide the information sought by the petitioners, under the Act.
Substantiating the objection, Sri Nagar submits that the Board is a
society registered under the provisions of the Societies Registration Act, 1860, and is not receiving any financial grant or
aid from the Central or the State Government. He further submits that Board is
not a creation of any Act of Legislature, and therefore, necessary ingredients to hold the Board as a
'public authority', under Section 2(h) of
the Act, are lacking, and consequently, the prayer made in the writ petition is
not liable to be granted.
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/170083046/
Calcutta
High Court (Appellete Side)
Dinesh
Sinha&Anr vs Council For The India School .
..
on 1 September, 2016
3........Bearing in mind the
said regulations and in view of the definition clause under section 2(a) of RTI Act, 2005 'appropriate Government' means
in relation to a public authority which is established, constituted, owned
controlled or substantially financed by funds provided directly and indirectly
by the Central Government or the Union territory administration or by the State
Government and further that the Council is established under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 is not under the control of the Ministry of
Human Resource Development.”
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/154299322/
CIC/CC/A/2015/001885 Dharamraj Kumar Kushwaha v. PIO,
CBSE , Decided on: 13.01.2017
“3. Mr. J.K. Das, Senior
advocate representing CISCE stated that the Council’s origin being established
by the University of Cambridge legally with the assistance of the interested
Board for Indians by the Societies Registration Act No XXI of 1860 it does not
fall within the definition clause of 2(h)(d)(ii) of the RTI Act and thus,
cannot be said to be a public body in possession of a document. “
Case
No. CIC/DS/C/2013/000542/MOHRD/MP ,Mukesh Jain VS CISCE, Date of Decision :
27th September, 2017
“5. The respondent stated that
complainant’s identical RTI application dated 30.11.2011 had been adjudicated
by the Commission in case No. CIC/DS/C/2013/000633 vide its order dated
15.07.2016 while relying upon the various decisions of the Commission, Hon’ble
Allahabad High Court judgment dated 15.12.2014 in the matter of A. Pavitra Vs.
UOI &Ors (WPC No. 60338/2014 that CISCE was not covered by the definition
of ‘public authority since it is neither funded nor controlled by the
Government or any other public body. He further stated that the Council for the
3 Indian School Certificate Examinations is an unaided autonomous educational
body registered as a Society under the Societies Registration Act and
conducting examinations for Classes X and XII for the students of its
affiliated schools. The Council did not fall within the definition of the
‘public authority’ and was not amenable to release information under the
provisions of the RTI Act, 2005.”
Central
Information Commission,Ms. OlivaJohncyvs Council For Indian School ... on 25
February, 2010 .Decision No. CIC/SG/C/2010/000190/6980
“The Commission in an
earlier Decision no. CIC/SG/C/2009/000585/3779 had observed that the Council is
an autonomous educational body registered under the Societies Act. The Council is neither established under any law nor is it owned,
controlled or financed by the Government. Therefore, the Section 2 (h)
of the RTI Act does not apply to the Council. The Council had
added that the aspect of applicability of the provisions of RTI Act to
the Council has been challenged in the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in WP (C)
No. 8537/2008 titled CISCE v. CIC &Anr wherein the order of the Commission
has been stayed by the Court vide order dated 02/12/2008.”
As
per RTI Reply from Delhi and Maharashtra CISCE (ICSE /ISC ) Boards are not
recognised by state govt. The HRD also denied their recognition. The District
education officer of Gwalior submitted Affidavit at Punjab and Haryana High
Court and provided the list of approved boards at Madhya Pradesh. The ICSE/ISC
is missing in approved boards of MP State.
At
Bombay High Court CISCE secretary Garry Arthoon (Cell/ Mobile Number
9910500869 ) filed affidavit that
CISCE is recognised by all the states , UT and HRD . In PIL159/2016 (Civil
side) the order confirmed the CISCE statement. But in PIL29/2020 (OS) Bombay
High Court Garry Arthoon filed affidavit that Maharahtra State have no control
On CISCE Boards. In the same court he filed contradictory affidavit.The CIC
ordered HRD to conduct investigation against CISCE fake operations across the country(2500+
Schools) but HRD kept silent due to political pressure. Copy of CIC order in
enclosed file.
The
papers which CISCE showing to innocent peoples are letters of few officers who
have no such authority to recognise the education board. Some letters where
found fake as per RTI reply.
The CISCE showing PIL 159/2016 Order of
Bombay High Court as recognized board is passed by Mr Pradeep Nandrajog Ex CJ
BHC who was also ICSE student as per record. He should recues the hearing as no
one can be the judge of its own cause. Many advocates , Judges , Officers at
top positions has passed 10/12th from ICSE board . Their certificates has no
value in law and it is just like tuition . All these researches are available
in public domain.Call
for help 9702859636
Why government is not taking action?
ReplyDeleteExactly why no ban or Any Action
ReplyDelete