India RTI News

  Palghar: A consumer of MSEB has filed Police complaint to register FIR against Electricity officers SDO Kolhe and SE Kiran Nagaonkar under IPC 420,166a,218,34,for offence in the color of dress .  As per complainant the MSEDCL officers removed the meter without notice and violated rule 56 of Electric Act  . The licensee does not claim that it has given 15 days notice under section 56 (1) of E. Act 2003 before disconnection or stopping of supply. Therefore such disconnection without giving such 15 days notice is illegal . In the color of dress the officers done crime which is cognizable offence as per SC Lalita Kumari Order  .  The Palghar Police has verbally denied to register FIR against against MSEDCL officer in the name of brotherhood and done contempt of lalita Kumari guidelines . The police officers will have to pay for contempt when contempt case will be filed before JMFC . Supreme court directed Magistrates to take contempt action for violation of lalita...

  उमरिया: Ashish Shrivastava Sub Registrar Umaria ऑफिस में बैठ कर रोज लाखो कमा रहे हैं। प्रॉपर्टी रजिस्ट्रेशन के लिए म्युनिसिपल एनओसी की जरूरत होती है पर फिर भी अवैध घर ऑफिस का रजिस्ट्रेशन हो रहा है। आरटीआई लगाने पर कोई एनओसी की कॉपी नही है ऐसा लिख कर भेज देते है। अपने विभाग के आदेश का पालन नही करते। सब रजिस्ट्रार का काम spot पर जाना भी होता है पर एजेंट के माध्यम से कोई स्थल का निरीक्षण नही होता। इतनी छूट देने के लिए कम से कम पांच हजार या अधिक एजेंट के माध्यम से वसूले जाते है। रोज ५०-१०० रजिस्ट्री आती है। अब चूकि एजेंट पहचाने होते है तो घूस डायरेक्ट नहीं ली जाती और anti corruption का लफ़ड़ा भी नहीं रहता। कई मामले में तो २५k से १ lac approx. तक वसूले जाते है। STAMP AND REGISTRATION OFFICE की काली कमाई ५० LAC के करीब हर महीने है। कटनी में तो रोज हर SUBREGISTRAR २-३ LAC रोज़ बनाते होंगे। पब्लिक अवैध घर बनाती है और ये काली कमाई? इनका काम है की आर्टिकल १२ के तहत काम करे पर इनको यह पसंद नही। कलेक्टर इनके बॉस होते है बाकी पब्लिक समझदार है। अगर जांच हो जाए तो सब पोल खुल जाएगी। यहां सब काम ...

  Trident Group के बुधनी यूनिट में 30 घंटों से लगी है भीषण आग, इतने करोड़ का हो चुका है नुकसान - Sehore : Budhni Court JMFC Shri Thakur Prasad Malviya order police report in CRPC 156 matter before registering FIR against directors of Trident  . On 6th April 21 their was high level fire at Sehore Budhni Plant and few people cause grevious hurt  . The police did not conducted preliminary enquiry due to high influence in cognizable offence  . The JMFC Budhni called for police report before ordering for registration of FIR . The allegation is that company have no FIRE NOC as per NBC rules and structures are also not having OC as per section 191 of MP Municipal act  . The enquiry will clear the true picture and confirm the fire incidence  . As per Supreme court Lalita Kumari order FIR is mandatory in cognizable offence . As per company sources Rs100 cr claim is applied from Insurance company . CNR Number MP 37 05 000777 2021 Case Type/Number/Year UN CR/1/2021 F...

  MANDLA JMFC SHRI SITRAM DAS ORDER FIR AGAINST BHUMIJA STEEL MANDLA FOR 3RD BLAST IN FURNACE IN THE YEAR 2021 IN CRPC 156 MATTER . BLAST ON 14 SEPT 2021 IN WHICH 6 PEOPLE GREVIOUS HURT  CNR Number MP 51 05 000896 2021 Case Type/Number/Year UN CR/165/2021 Filing | Registration Date 23-09-2021 | 23-09-2021 Status Disposed Date of Decision 2021-09-28 Nature of Disposal Order Passed, Allowed Pending First Date List 23-09-2021 Next Listed Date 28-09-2021 Stage of Case Miscellanceous matters not defined otherwise Court No. & Judge 5 - I Civil Judge Class-II -   Sitaram Das Petitioner 1.)SAPAN SHRIVASTAVA 2.) BIHARI LAL SONI Respondent 1.)MUKESH KUMAR BANSAL @BHUMIJAA STEEL 3.) MANOJ BANSAL. 4.) UNKNOWN 5.) STATE THROUGH SHO BIJADANDI

  Mumbai: The Criminal Complaint filed before bandra court for registration of FIR against RN Podar CBSE School , Santacruz Mumbai under CRPC 156(3) .  The complainant SK Shrivastava registered complaint in the year 2020 to santacruz police station that school is registered without compliance of municipal norms ie Fire NOC .  As per rule of law the schools must have FIRE NOC - Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of  Avinash Mehrotra vs. Union of India and others  reported in (2009) 6 SCC 398 . The MCGM and CBSE has registered school without compliance under law  . The police kept the complaint pending and DCP also not took action as per CRPC 154(3)  .  Now complainant approached court and submitted complaint to register FIR under IPC 420,120B,406,467, 336 etc with section 36 of Fire act . As per Supreme court order ie  lalita kumari guidelines FIR is  mandatory in cognizable offence  .

   SUPREME COURT ASKED PETITIONER: IN WHAT TIME HE CAN VACANT THE FLAT FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL? New Delhi: In the hearing of ABA matter the Hon'ble SC Judges Shri Ajay Rastogi and Shri Abhay Oka asked the petitioner Vinod R Chavan that it is not fair to grab the flat and ask for anticipatery bail .  The court directed the petitioner to file affidavit that in what time period the petitioner can vacate the flat to get ABA allowed . In past the informant and petitioner was friend .  The petitioner helped informant in Slum Rehabilation flat with verbal committment of 20% commission  . The petitioner help informant for occupation in Rs 1 cr approx flat at Antop Hill Mumbai . Later informant gave his Rs10 lac value flat (Market rent Rs 2000 approx)for stay till his wish in June 2017 .  After few months informant directed petitioner to vacate the flat without paying any charges  .  When petitioner denied to vacate flat then informant took the help of goon...